Following reports of the beginning of attacks by the United States of America and the Zionist regime against our beloved country, these events have been described with terms such as “war,” “war crime,” and “terrorist act.” This variety of descriptions raises the question of exactly which legal framework these actions fall into: Are we facing a war, examples of war crimes, or even terrorist actions? These titles are not merely verbal differences; each carries important implications in the domain
Statements by Fatemeh Mohammadbeigi, a member of the Majlis Health Commission, regarding attacks on 24 pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies in Iran, reveal a reality that goes beyond a conventional military action. She described these attacks as a clear example of a war crime and emphasized that the enemy’s method differs fundamentally from conventional military warfare. This fundamental difference leads us to the question: Are we merely facing a war crime, or a form of state
It is an undeniable reality that the overt aggression by the United States and the Zionist regime against the Islamic Republic of Iran constitutes a flagrant and indisputable violation of the Charter of the United Nations and fundamental international law.
The recourse to force against the territorial integrity and political independence of Iran, strictly prohibited under the explicit provisions of Article 2, Paragraph 4, of the UN Charter, not only undermines the very foundations of
"He would deposit the extra amount he received as director-general in favor of the warriors, and he did this solely for the pleasure of God."
According to Habilian, Hojjatoleslam, martyr Ali Iranmanesh was born in 1932 in Kerman into a poor family that placed little value on worldly wealth. Martyr Mohammad-Javad Bahonar was his maternal cousin. The two friends learned to read the Quran from their grandmother at the age of seven. In 1952, after finishing fifth grade, they left for the Qom
Date of Birth: 1961, Binabaj, Gonabad
Occupation: IRGC member
Date of Assassination: November 9, 1981
Martyr Hassan Binabaji was born in 1981 in Binabaj, Gonabad, into a poor but deeply religious family. From early childhood, he knew poverty and hardship. He completed elementary and middle school with success and went on to study at Navvab Safavi High School. At the height of the Islamic Revolution, he raised his voice against the tyrants of the time and joined street demonstrations alongside
In the 54th session of the trial concerning the charges against 104 members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK), also known as the Monafeqin, held on February 17, 2026, at Branch 11 of the Criminal Court of Tehran Province, the court continued its examination of the group’s terrorist activities. Presided over by Judge Amirreza Dehghani, with advisors Morteza Turk and Amin Naseri, the session focused on the MEK’s role in arming groups and inciting violence during recent unrest in Iran
February 18, marks one of the bitterest and most defeat-laden days for the terrorist Mujahedin-e Khalq group. It was the day when the first group of MEK members — who for years had claimed with false boasts and harsh slogans that Ashraf Camp was their “invincible base” — boarded Iraqi vehicles and left the soil of this base for Camp Liberty.
This event was not merely a geographical relocation but the collapse of a great lie and a display of the depth of helplessness and strategic defeat of a
On the occasion of the International Day for the Prevention of Violent Extremism as and when conducive to Terrorism, observed on February 12, a review of Iran’s experience over the past decade offers valuable lessons with global relevance. The day serves as a reminder of a bitter truth: violent extremism, regardless of borders or beliefs, has targeted lives and peace of mind across the world.
Over the past ten years, the destructive activities of extremist terrorist groups—driven by differing
TEHRAN, Feb. 12 (MNA) – On the occasion of the International Day for the Prevention of Violent Extremism as and when Conducive to Terrorism, it is important to revisit the historical roots of extremist movements and their impact on global stability.
On the occasion of the International Day for the Prevention of Violent Extremism as and when Conducive to Terrorism, it is important to revisit the historical roots of extremist movements and their impact on global stability. One of the
The Conference on Victims of Terrorism in Iran’s Sistan and Baluchestan Province will be held from 14 to 17 February in the city of Zahedan.
The event is being organized through the joint efforts of the Habilian Association (Families of Iranian Victims of Terrorism), the Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs, and the National Congress of Martyrs of Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Alongside commemorating the victims of terrorism, the conference aims to examine and analyze various
In the 53rd session of the trial concerning the charges against 104 members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK), also known as the Monafeqin, held on February 3, 2026, at Branch 11 of the Criminal Court of Tehran Province, the court continued its examination of the group’s long history of terrorist activities. Presided over by Judge Amirreza Dehghani, with advisors Morteza Turk and Amin Naseri, the session featured testimony from a defected member of the organization who drew direct
Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence announced that 12 members of the extremist group Ansar al-Forqan were killed or arrested during security operations in Sistan and Baluchestan Province.
According to a statement released by the Ministry and reported by Fars News Agency, 11 individuals were detained in three joint operations conducted by the Qods Base of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the provincial intelligence department of Sistan and Baluchestan, and the national law enforcement
In the 52nd session of the trial concerning the charges against 104 members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK), also known as the Monafeqin, held on January 20, 2026, at Branch 11 of the Criminal Court of Tehran Province, the court focused on the group’s ongoing terrorist activities and its responsibility for violence during recent unrest in Iran. Presided over by Judge Amirreza Dehghani, with advisors Morteza Turk and Amin Naseri, the session addressed the MEK’s role in arming groups
Modern warfare is often chronicled as a battle for territory and resources. Yet, Ronen Bergman’s book, Rise and Kill First, pulls back the curtain on a far more sinister conflict: the war on "knowledge" itself. As we approach the anniversary of the assassination of Iran's prominent scientists, a re-reading of this book not only illuminates the history of Mossad’s assassinations but also provides a pattern that explains recent events and the targeting of experts in emerging fields.
Bergman
Hours after a massive, million-strong rally across various cities in Iran condemning the chaos and terrorist acts of armed criminal groups, the European Parliament, which has consistently demonstrated its disdain for the Iranian people by inviting separatist and anti-Iranian terrorist groups, announced a worthless measure to ban the entry of Iranian diplomats and officials to the Parliament in a bid to support dying unrest.
The President of the European Parliament, whose institution failed to
In recent days, terms such as "terrorism," "terrorist actions," and "terrorist groups" have been frequently used in the political and media discourse of the country. The utilization of these concepts is not merely for psychological operations or political exploitation; rather, the realities unfolding on the ground indicate that what has transpired is an unprecedented and blatant violence employing various intimidation tactics.
The unprecedented scale of attacks using both firearms and melee
Analysis indicates that the enemy is targeting Iran's security and territorial integrity through terrorism and diplomatic pressure. Developments at the beginning of 2026 reveal that enemy think tanks have shed their diplomatic masks and entered a phase of "open warfare" against Iran's national security. What we are witnessing today is the execution of a military and security scenario in which separatist groups and the hypocritical movement, under the direct guidance of foreign services, have
The 51st session of the criminal court examining charges against 104 members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) convened in Tehran, focusing on the group's alleged atrocities committed at a hospital in Islamabad-e Gharb. Presiding Judge Amir Reza Dehghani opened the session with a direct address to the media, emphasizing the critical role of journalists in recording "historical truth" and bridging the gap between the courtroom's legal findings and the public's conscience. He stated that the trial
The 49th and 50th sessions of the Criminal Court of Tehran, tasked with examining the charges against the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), convened to address the legal implications of European support for the group. Presiding Judge Amir Reza Dehghani focused the proceedings on what he termed the "double standards" of the European Union, specifically citing complaints regarding the hosting of the group's media networks and the invitation of its leadership to the European Parliament. The court argued
In the early hours of this morning, two separate terrorist attacks occurred in the provinces of Kerman and Sistan and Baluchestan. In Fahraj County, Kerman province, armed elements attacked a police checkpoint, leading to the martyrdom of three law enforcement officers—Saeed Hadipour, Morad Salehi, and Eisa Borsam—as well as a civilian, a 16-year-old Baloch teenager named Mansour Lajehi. The terrorist group Ansar al-Forqan has claimed responsibility for this assault.
Simultaneously, in the
Following reports of the beginning of attacks by the United States of America and the Zionist regime against our beloved country, these events have been described with terms such as “war,” “war crime,” and “terrorist act.” This variety of descriptions raises the question of exactly which legal framework these actions fall into: Are we facing a war, examples of war crimes, or even terrorist actions? These titles are not merely verbal differences; each carries important implications in the domain
