June 13 marks the first anniversary of one of the darkest violations of international law in the region's contemporary history; the military attack by the Israeli regime which in political literature became known as the 12-day war. What distinguishes this event from many military actions is not merely the number of victims—over a thousand Iranians—but the nature of the targeting, the locations of the attacks, and the demographic composition of the victims. In this illegal aggression, a number
Today, the President of the United States once again repeated his and his predecessors' usual tiresome accusations, charging Iran with supporting terrorism. When US officials accuse Iran of "state terrorism," they are, in fact, through a psychological projection, presenting an image of their own decades of violent and illegal conduct to public opinion for judgment. This is the same defensive psychological mechanism of projection that has become a familiar strategy in the foreign policy of
June 3rd (Khordad 3rd), the anniversary of the liberation of Khorramshahr, is not only a reminder of the bravery of the warriors of Islam; it is also testimony to the treachery of groups who, alongside the Ba'athist enemy, stabbed Iran's backlines. The book "Da" (Mother), the memoirs of Seyedeh Zahra Hosseini, presents a rarely seen image of the MKO's collaboration with Saddam during the days of Khorramshahr's occupation.
June 3rd (Khordad 3rd) is not just a golden leaf in the national honor
In the past two decades, terrorism has emerged not only as a security threat but as a fundamental challenge to the foundations of human rights and the international order. This phenomenon, trampling upon the basic rules of humanitarian law, primarily targets defenseless civilians, and among them, children, as the most innocent group, bear the brunt of this organized violence.
Within this global perspective, our homeland, Iran, as one of the countries that has borne the heaviest burden of
When assassination turns a child's brain into a factory for producing fear, salvation lies in a relationship that transmits the message "This place is safe" directly to their nervous system.
According to Habilian, at the specialized conference "Children in the Shadow of Terror" in cooperation with the Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Dr. Seyed Amir Amin-Yazdi, a faculty member, criticized the mechanical view of the child victim and presented the
The name Carlo Ciccioli first appeared in publicly released reports by the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK) on December 29, 2009. As chairman of the Italian Committee of Parliamentarians and Citizens for a Free Iran—a lobbying group established with MEK support—Ciccioli issued a statement criticizing the Iranian government and, while repeating MEK claims and rhetoric, accused Tehran of suppressing protesters.
Exactly two months later, Ciccioli participated in a hearing held jointly by the
On June 7, 1986, an airport on the outskirts of Paris witnessed the takeoff of an aircraft that marked one of the bloodiest and most treacherous chapters in contemporary Iranian history. As Massoud Rajavi, the leader of the terrorist Mojahedin-e-Khalq organization (MKO), also known as the Monafeqin (hypocrites), left France for Iraq, this move was dubbed a "historic flight" in the group's lexicon. In reality, it was the beginning of the final metamorphosis of a group claiming to fight for
On May 2, 2025, Donald Trump, then President of the United States, took an unusual step during a press conference and effectively confessed to a covert arms operation against the Islamic Republic of Iran. According to a credible report by The Guardian, Trump, responding to a question about U.S. weapons intended for Iranian protesters that had been diverted to Iranian Kurdish opposition groups in Iraq, said: "I'm not happy about the weapons being delivered. I'm not thrilled about it, but a small
From the perspective of international law, the deliberate targeting of civilian water infrastructure constitutes a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions.
In the wake of the United States and Israeli regime's unconventional military strikes against Iran, reports of extensive damage to the country's vital water infrastructure at 300 locations — amounting to over 5,500 billion tomans — have sounded a serious alarm for Iran's national security and civil rights. According to the head of Iran's
Attacks on pharmaceutical and medical equipment manufacturing facilities are categorically prohibited under the principles of distinction and proportionality.
Statements by Fatemeh Mohammadbeigi, a member of Parliament's Health Commission, regarding attacks on 24 Iranian pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies have laid bare a reality that transcends ordinary wartime conduct. She described these attacks as "clear instances of war crimes" and emphasized that "the enemy's methods differ
Following reports of the beginning of attacks by the United States of America and the Zionist regime against our beloved country, these events have been described with terms such as “war,” “war crime,” and “terrorist act.” This variety of descriptions raises the question of exactly which legal framework these actions fall into: Are we facing a war, examples of war crimes, or even terrorist actions? These titles are not merely verbal differences; each carries important implications in the domain
Statements by Fatemeh Mohammadbeigi, a member of the Majlis Health Commission, regarding attacks on 24 pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies in Iran, reveal a reality that goes beyond a conventional military action. She described these attacks as a clear example of a war crime and emphasized that the enemy’s method differs fundamentally from conventional military warfare. This fundamental difference leads us to the question: Are we merely facing a war crime, or a form of state
February 18, marks one of the bitterest and most defeat-laden days for the terrorist Mujahedin-e Khalq group. It was the day when the first group of MEK members — who for years had claimed with false boasts and harsh slogans that Ashraf Camp was their “invincible base” — boarded Iraqi vehicles and left the soil of this base for Camp Liberty.
This event was not merely a geographical relocation but the collapse of a great lie and a display of the depth of helplessness and strategic defeat of a
On the occasion of the International Day for the Prevention of Violent Extremism as and when conducive to Terrorism, observed on February 12, a review of Iran’s experience over the past decade offers valuable lessons with global relevance. The day serves as a reminder of a bitter truth: violent extremism, regardless of borders or beliefs, has targeted lives and peace of mind across the world.
Over the past ten years, the destructive activities of extremist terrorist groups—driven by differing
TEHRAN, Feb. 12 (MNA) – On the occasion of the International Day for the Prevention of Violent Extremism as and when Conducive to Terrorism, it is important to revisit the historical roots of extremist movements and their impact on global stability.
On the occasion of the International Day for the Prevention of Violent Extremism as and when Conducive to Terrorism, it is important to revisit the historical roots of extremist movements and their impact on global stability. One of the
Modern warfare is often chronicled as a battle for territory and resources. Yet, Ronen Bergman’s book, Rise and Kill First, pulls back the curtain on a far more sinister conflict: the war on "knowledge" itself. As we approach the anniversary of the assassination of Iran's prominent scientists, a re-reading of this book not only illuminates the history of Mossad’s assassinations but also provides a pattern that explains recent events and the targeting of experts in emerging fields.
Bergman
Hours after a massive, million-strong rally across various cities in Iran condemning the chaos and terrorist acts of armed criminal groups, the European Parliament, which has consistently demonstrated its disdain for the Iranian people by inviting separatist and anti-Iranian terrorist groups, announced a worthless measure to ban the entry of Iranian diplomats and officials to the Parliament in a bid to support dying unrest.
The President of the European Parliament, whose institution failed to
In recent days, terms such as "terrorism," "terrorist actions," and "terrorist groups" have been frequently used in the political and media discourse of the country. The utilization of these concepts is not merely for psychological operations or political exploitation; rather, the realities unfolding on the ground indicate that what has transpired is an unprecedented and blatant violence employing various intimidation tactics.
The unprecedented scale of attacks using both firearms and melee
Analysis indicates that the enemy is targeting Iran's security and territorial integrity through terrorism and diplomatic pressure. Developments at the beginning of 2026 reveal that enemy think tanks have shed their diplomatic masks and entered a phase of "open warfare" against Iran's national security. What we are witnessing today is the execution of a military and security scenario in which separatist groups and the hypocritical movement, under the direct guidance of foreign services, have
As we mark Sacred Defense Week, re-examining the Iraqi Ba'athist regime's invasion of Iran reveals bitter truths that remain critically relevant. Saddam Hussein, driven by a long-standing hostility that predated the Revolution, was always searching for a pretext to attack. His ambitions were enabled by terrorist groups like the KDPI and Komala, whose mercenary history with the Iraqi regime made them key collaborators. By destabilizing Iran's border regions, these groups, who held no loyalty to