|The reason why this point is important is that the hypocrites' Organization, by persistent reliance on its acts before June 20th, tried to impress that it had a legal basis and its acts were lawful. Of course, I must point out that such reliances are one-sided, farfetched and superficial.|
IN'TRODUCTION 'TO EVEN'TS BEFORE JUNE 20, 1981
You have heard the introductory talk of my brother Ithna Ashari. As he has stated, in this part of the program we will deal with the position and activities of the hypocrites before June 20th 1981, on the basis of the submitted questions. But before talking about the Social Section, it would first be necessary to mention several points. Sufficient attention should be paid to these points during the discussion since these will be the basis for the summing up of this part of the discussion in these sessions.
THE ERRONEOUS, 'POLITICAL' AND 'MILITARY' PHASES
In our talk, we will follow a general and essential objective, namely to show that the nature of the acts and positions of the hypocrites did not change after the victory of the Revolution up to June20th, 1981 as compared with the period after this date In fact, between the phase before June 20th which is called the 'Political phase' and the later phase known as the 'Military phase', there is no distinction from the viewpoint of 'contents'. So if during the discussions such phrases as the political phase, military phase, political conditions and military conditions are used, they should be considered as errors in common use.
The reason why this point is important is that the hypocrites' Organization, by persistent reliance on its acts before June 20th, tried to impress that it had a legal basis and its acts were lawful. Of course, I must point out that such reliances are one-sided, farfetched and superficial.
In consideration of the intrinsic basis which is inherent in the nature of these lines, positions and acts, we will expose this matter and show that all the acts related to the period after February 11, 1979, until June 20, 1981, in fact, were aimed at preparing the ground for the acts after June 20th.
In short, in our analysis, we will conclude that the hypocrites' Organization has not only not been a political one in the special sense of the word, but a wholly terroristic, anti-people and unlawful one.
The second point is that the hypocrites, headed by Rajavi may say,«In our annual summing up of 1981-2, we had stated that we did not accept the regime of the Islamic Republic and its leadership from the beginning, but we were compelled to do so temporarily.
In answer to this, we say that the problem is not the regime of the Islamic Republic or its leadership, but rather the basis of your relations with the Revolution, with Islam and the people. This is where the term 'hypocrites' becomes meaningful. Before going any further, we must define this relationship and if Rajavi and the hateful group of hypocrites are not aware of it (something which they certainly know and only pretend not to), then let them listen carefully to our explanation of this relationship and let shame be upon them.